Sunday, June 8, 2008

Smiles of an Almost-Summer Afternoon

Yesterday was wonderful. 


I didn’t think it would be, since it was supposed to very busy, what with a party of 30 adults and 9 children ranging from 7 months old to 15 planning to descend upon us from 3 to 5. These were my daughter and her husband’s friends, all in their late 30s and early 40s, very nice people. Still, I anticipated chaos, noise, lots of whining, kids crashing into tables full of food, food itself that wasn’t very good, guests who were too busy parenting to enjoy themselves. And most of all, great heat (well, for June 7, at about 30 degrees C) followed by violent thunder storms.

Instead, we got an afternoon where, despite the heat, the house was cool, with fans spinning, and the backyard cooler, full of  wind blowing the things that maples shed at this time of the year and little girls in sundresses flitting around between the flowers and the young tomato plants. Adults sitting in house chairs on the patio, rather than in the house, laughing and talking, as children wove their way in and out, reporting booboos, getting watermellon slices and potato chips and soft drinks and fruit juice. The boys age 8 to 10  hunkered down in the tv room watching Star Wars; the girls helped decorate a white cake with smarties, then played with Barbies on a blanket on the lawn or drew with colored markers. All the children rode Phillippe the large, rusting rocking horse, or crawled into the tiny tent. Tallis, the youngest, alternated looking very sweet in a little green sundress and crying. Mostly, she rode around on Jeff’s arm, looking interested, or sat on Pasley’s lap. Both Jeff and John heroically pushed her around the neighborhood in the stroller to get her to sleep.

The food was good, the cake was better, and everyone helped, especially Marc LeG, who ferried little girls around on his shoulders apparantly tirelessly, then stayed to put chairs back and clean up the patio. (He will make a great husband and father some day!) There are people I got to talk to and those I wanted to talk to that I never got around to. I was in fairly good condition, but wheezing, and I could feel my blood pressure rising just from the stress, even though the party was very stress-free. But I was relatively pain-free, which was amazing, due to Lyrica and a short course of Prednisone. 

And it seemed like ages ago that I had been so sick with a really drippy spring cold (Monday to Friday), and then a night of terrible dysentry-like stomach cramps and the trots that accompanied them (Thursday). Amazing how the body can jump back: I was able, on Friday night, the night after that ‘dysentry night,’ to  go to a restaurant-located party for Vanier College teachers in Little Italy where the streets around were roped off and decorated with Lamberginis and other expensive sports cars, while beautiful people flitted about holding filled champagne flutes under white pavillions set up by the sports car reps. I ate a good dinner, chatted with people and felt fine. As I do today. Although I would be hard-pressed to accept any more social obligations today. Luckily we have none planned for today.

The occasion was to celebrate Jeff and Pasley’s 10th Anniversary. They both looked wonderful, with Jeff certainly the most handsome man in the room, and Paze the most beautiful, not even counting her red hair and wonderful cleavage in a truly remarkable green sundress with a full, gauzy skirt and nipped in waist and low neckline. They seemed very happy. 

It was our Anniversary this week, too–our 40th. We didn’t really get to celebrate it because of my sickness, but hope to do so tomorrow night. All in all, a wonderful weekend thus far.  
 
Posted by Beviant at 15:18:55 | Permalink | Comments (2)

Tuesday, June 3, 2008

40th Anniversary Reflections

It’s hard to believe that John and I have been together for more than two thirds of our lifetimes! Wow! And it’s been a wonderful forty years, too. 

 

I never could have had a better husband than John. His dry wit alone has seen us through both good and bad times. Plus, he is the most considerate man I know, starting with the cup of tea or coffee brought to my bedside every morning of our married life, or–these days, when I can enjoy sleeping in with the sloth of the retired–the pot of hot coffee left on the table for me if he leaves for work before I get up.

 

Apart from sleeping together for forty years in a bed that is smaller than the modern double bed, we have danced together (from jive to disco to waltz); marked papers together at the same messy dining room table; cooked together (me cutting up veggies, him stirring and watching to see thing didn’t burn); watched birds together (from our own back porch, mainly); done crossword puzzles together (John coming in especially at the end to finish up the last difficult answers).

 

We have  driven from the tip of Cornwall up to northern Scotland and down again to Kent, without killing each other, even when we got peckish each day around teatime). We have listened to classical music together  at one point, sharing a libretto together on the same sagging sofa while Wagnerian music moved us almost to tears). We have read things out loud to one another. We have wallpapered the bathroom together twice and still remained undivorced.

 

We have  bought a house together, slowly, over 25 years, mortgage payment after mortgage payment, without any rich relative dying and leaving us enough to pay it off all at once; we have managed this despite interest rates of that rose from 4% to 18% over those years. We have painted and decorated its rooms, dug and planted the garden, paid repairmen for the inevitable problems with the roof and the pipes (the latter being dug up  in midwinter, in frozen ground, at our expense, of course.). We have paid off that mortgage, finally, and felt the satisfaction of being home owners. 


We have laughed and cried together with joy at the birth of our daughter. We have, together, walked and fed and diapered her when she was crying and crying and crying as a collicky baby. We have watched, helping her together with homework, booboos of all kinds and a few crazy boyfriends, as she grew into a beautiful, bright, considerate, loving person, our greatest achievement. 

 

We have clung together during some scary times (his brain operation, our daughter’s attack of arrhythmia, my various asthma attacks, the Ice Storm, Y2K, 911, our grand daughters’ births, my knee replacement surgery).  We have laughed together and raised glasses of  various alcoholic beverages, from beer to oozo to scotch to wine, on Pasley Island, the Greek island of Skiathos, the British Isles, and the island of Montreal.

 

I know I have been very lucky and yet I also know that luck was only part of this achievement, that it involved day after day of working at being married, gently, with love, faith in one another, and mutual respect. We made mistakes, of course, but fewer, I think, than many couples do, because we really wanted a different kind of marriage.


We married when no one else was getting married; traditional marriage was considered a joke (or so it seemed in 1971), so a lot of our approach to marriage came from a reaction against the traditional marriage.  This started with our tiny but beautiful wedding (which was still the best wedding I’ve ever been to!), with a $25 wedding dress and no wedding ring, no relatives present, and no gift worth more than an electric beater, and a honeymoon that consisted of sleeping in a rented car, him in the back seat and me in the front, with a tent tarp slung over the car to keep it darkish after daylight, and two cats on leashes outside meowing to get in away from the blackflies.


I swore to myself from the beginning not to ever be the kind of wife who nagged or said “Not tonite, dear, I have a headache.” I have made a point of being agreeable rather than pouting when John got drunk at parties or was late for dinner or wanted to go out to drink or play tennis with his buddies. I have made a point of being calm when he couldn’t find his keys almost every morning on his way to work. I’m sure John has had many similar things he has had to put up with concerning me, the least of which was putting up with my shopping habits (which I still swear are just typical of all modern women).

 

It has been one of my great satisfactions to see that our daughter has found a husband just as wonderful as John: the new kind of husband, the kind that is up to the challenge of working beside the new kind of woman– one who has both a career and a family– and not feel emasculated. When John and I got married, this kind of husband and wife, this kind of marriage, didn’t yet exist. I like to think that either we helped to invent and define such a thing, or that we rode the cusp of a North American movement toward it.

 

It has been a long, strange, wonderful journey. And, unless John is currently  preparing divorce papers even as I type, it happily isn’t over yet!

 

 


Posted by Beviant at 15:30:50 | Permalink | Comments (2)

Thursday, May 29, 2008

Lyrica Experiment, Part 2

May 29, 2008:  

10 am.:   Since meeting with Dr. Gore two days ago, I have been taking three Lyrica tablets a day instead of two. After a month on Lyrica, I was feeling quite a bit better, but my knees were still hurting. The first day, after taking the second tablet at noon, I felt very drowsy, lay down for a nap, slept for 2 hours, and had a hard time getting up to make dinner. Yesterday, I took the pill at 2 pm, having forgotten to take it at noon.  I  shopped for groceries painlessly. I could even stand at the bus stop painlessly for about 10 minutes, waiting for a bus, carrying my heavy purse and two small bags of groceries. And when I got home, instead of collapsing or napping, I was wide awake and not weary at all. When John came home at 5, I told him that I was pretty well pain free, which was very nice. felt jazzed up rather than drowsy, and wasn’t tired even when I went to bed at 10. Today my knees are stiff, but then I haven’t done any walking yet. As for the rest of me, I feel pretty good. Which is nice.


 Hooray! Now, if this can only last!

Posted by Beviant at 15:06:16 | Permalink | Comments (3)

Monday, May 5, 2008

Oratorio Terezin–A Hidden Agenda?

Yesterday I was lucky enough to be present at the Montreal Premier of Oratorio Terezin by Ruth Fazal. It was presented at Salle Wilfred Pelletier at Place des Arts, a posh spot, and although the theater was only 3/4 full, the audience was attentive and appreciative. It was quite long—over three hours in all–and very intense, but the singing was wonderful. Several choirs were present: The Vanier Singers, a childen’s choir and another choir, plus a small orchestra and five soloists.


Ruth Fazal, who is a Christian, takes letters and poems written by Jewish children in Terezin concentration camp and weaves them together with passages from the Old Testament. In the work, as the children–and the Jews themselves–remain in the camp, they go through various stages of emotion, almost like the stages of grief that have been written about: denial, during which they talk about how they will be going home soon; annoyance, in which they talk of minor complaints; despair, during which they cry out for God to save them; anger, with which they tell themselves that their Lord will smite the unjust; uncertainty, when they wonder if God has forgotten or rejected them; anguish, when they ask themselves what they could have done to anger Him; sorrow at their situation and at God’s silence; hope for a future in which they can be reconciled to God.

In the midst of all this intensity, there is a segment that made me wonder. It is the passage from Isaiah in which the prophet talks of a man growing up in obscurity, “a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief”, who was “afflicted” and “suffered for our sins, and who was “led like a lamb to slaughter.’ I wondered, as I sat there listening, if the Jews in the audience realized that these are the words that classical music lovers know well because they are used in a part of Handel’s Messiah, where they refer to Jesus. For the Jews, I guess they refer to the Messiah, but it’s confusing, because Isaiah speaks of this person in the past tense rather than in the future tense, which is odd for a prediction, whether of a Messiah or of Jesus. Could Isaiah originally have been speaking of someone who had already lived? Did the Jews pick up his words and think they described a future Messiah the way the Christians saw them as a prophesy about a future Jesus? 

More to the point, why did Ruth Fazal use this passage in Oratorio Terezin? 

Is she suggesting that what kept the Jews alive was a hope in the coming of the Messiah? That seems strange, for if the Messiah was going to come and suffer, the Holocaust would have been a good time for him to have appeared, when there was suffering enough for all. Is she suggeting that the Jews identified themselves with a suffering Messiah they thought Isaiah had promised them? Or was she, on some level at least, implying that they might have had more hope if they had believed in Jesus? 

Ruth Fazal is not only a Christian, but a very fervent one, one who believes that God led her to this material and sustained her during her composition of it. Could she then have been without any Christian sentiment as she wrote it? Could she subconsciously have chosen that passage with Jesus in mind, even as she arranged it as one of the prophesies from the Jewish prophets? Could she in fact have included this passage to suggest a kind of link to Christianity, which also believes in a suffering leader, as if to say that we have something in common with the Jews, even apart from the fact that we have used all their stories from the Torah for our own Old Testament, plus their prophesies as ones for our Jesus?

There is also, according to my husband, a place in the work where she introduces a few lines of a well-known.hymn by Handel, She was apparently quite annoyed when the conductor, on his own, told the orchestra to play this with disdain, since it was a Lutheran hymn and Lutherans hated the Jews. He understood that Fazal was putting in in there ironically. Instead, she had some idea about Lutherans that was positive. All this does make me wonder if she had a hidden agenda.

One of the soloist is supposed to be The Voice of God. The singer was a tall, young man with shoulder length hair, a tenor, quite a surprise for those who think of God as a mature, Jove-like being with a beard. His songs made me mad, even though they were beautiful in themselves. As the choirs sang of the Jews’ cries of sorrow, pain and outrage, the Voice of God sang passages from Psalms and from the prophets about how God had always loved the Jews, therefore how could he forget them? Rather than then voicing God’s advice or consolation, the young tenor sang the lovely words from the Song of Solomon: “Awake, my love, it is spring, and the sound of the turtledove is heard in the land.” I beg your pardon? How does this help the suffering Jews? I know that these passages, which contain such lovely love poems, are considered by both the Jews and the Christians as symbolic of God, i.e. the bridegroom, calling His people, or his Church., i.e. the bride, but I still don’t see how this fits in which the situation in the Oratorio. If this is God’s answer to his suffering people, the Jews, what is he saying? He’s saying “I love you”, I guess. But it sounds both beautiful—invoking as it does the beauty of spring–and cruel, since the Jews are in a concentration camp, forced to find beauty in dandelions and the occasional butterfly.

It doesn’t matter, of course, except that as it is, the piece doesn’t really have a conclusion that works, in my estimation. After the anger and sorrow of the songs, there is a passage from Psalms about going into a garden and seeing the richness of the earth. I thought, “Oh great. This suggests Israel, God’s gift to the Jews after all their suffering, and how they will turn a desert into something rich and arable.” But no, the next poem, in describing some aspect of natural beauty, mentions the barbwire again, so they must still be in the camp. 

And then, just when there seems to be no answer to the situation of the Jews at all, the children begin to sing: ‘Da da da da da da da da da da da,” over and over and over, until it is finally taken up by the adult choir and eventually by the orchestra. It is a very long passage of repetition, and then, with a flourish of trumpets and timpani, the work ends. What does ‘da da da’ mean, though? Does it represent whistling in the dark? The passage of time? John says it is supposed to be a song of joy. Oh, really? It’s monotony keeps it from sounding joyful; it sounds like Morse Code, using all dots and no dashes, not like notes of joy.  And it feels as if Ruth Fazal really didn’t know how to resolve the tension of the work she had created. I had half-expected a ‘rescue by the Allies’ segment of victorious music; or a segment when they  sang in joy at release; or one when they set sail for Israel, or reconciled with their God; or thanked him for the gift of a new land. But no; it’s as if at the end we are only hearing telegrams being sent around the world, which eventually lead to, supposedly, the flourish (of freedom?) at the end.

Very strange. It was quite beautiful and dramatic, however, and I’m glad I went.
Posted by Beviant at 19:12:49 | Permalink | Comments (6)

Tuesday, April 29, 2008

THE LYRICA EXPERIMENT

   On April 28, 2008, I asked my doctor for a prescription for Lyrica. I did so because it was the only medicine I knew about for treatment of fibromyalgia. I had seen the ads in magazines, and although I had been a bit put off by the two pages listing all the terrible side effects–ranging from weight gain and dry mouth to drowsiness, swelling of the legs and stroke—I felt that I was at the end of my rope in terms of pain and needed to at least try this medication. After all, my other meds have certainly helped me to be symptom-free for asthma, for example, and without stomach pain due to taking corticode steroids for athritis. 

  I was despairing because, a year after my right knee had been replaced, I still couldn’t walk more than a block without needing to sit down. And I had to lean on something while walking: my ugly black cane (good also for getting a seat on the bus) or, for two awful weeks in April, my grand-daughter’s stroller, which acted as a kind of walker, but with which I still had to stop and sit on the steps of porches or the ledges of stone walls along the way (I chose ones where there was no car in the driveway, hoping that meant no one was home.)

   My legs and arthritic feet hurt so much that walking, even in orthopedic shoes, was like walking barefoot on sharp rocks, with the pain going up my leg at every step. And my left knee, the one without a new replacement, was hurting a lot, but mainly in the tissue around the kneecap. 

April 28, 2008–10 pm:  Took first Lyrica tablet before bed. I was a bit afraid, and told John that if I was still sound asleep when he left for work, he should put the phone next to me on the bed and then phone me after his class. I was worried about the ‘it might make you drowsy’ warning on the enclosed papers.

 

April 29, 2008, 7 am:  Well, I woke up in the night to pee and didn’t feel particularly drowsy or drugged. I went back to sleep easily, but not with a sense of being drugged. And now I’m completely awake, and have just taken my first of two Lyrica tablets for the day. Ooops! Even as I typed that sentence, I remembered that I’m only supposed to take one a day for the first week. Arrg. As far as the pill is concerned, is it my imagination, or does my left leg already feel better? 

 

April 29, 2008, 8:30 a.m: Am I just imagining it, or was climbing the stairs  easier just now? BTW, no sign of drowsiness. Maybe the three cups of coffee I had for breakfast counteracted that one. Or maybe I’m just not the type to get drowsy from this pill.

Posted by Beviant at 13:40:51 | Permalink | Comments (3)

Sunday, April 20, 2008

Devon Visiting

I have had my almost-six-years old grand-daughter Devon over for the last two nights, and it has been a delight to hear some of her comments. For example.


1. She picked up a tiny book we have and read its title: Romeo and Juliet. “Oh, my mommy showed me the movie of Romeo and Juliet,” she declared. “It’s about this boy and girl whose family are enemies, but they fall in love. Then she pretends to be dead, but she’s just asleep, and when he sees she’s dead he kills himself and then she wakes up and sees him dead and kills herself. So you can see, it’s very serious.”

2. While playing Cinderella in the back garden: “I may not have a dress to wear to go to the ball, but I have a bank card that my father left me when he died so I can get money and buy a dress. Or, I can plant a twig and when it grows it’s the kind of tree that gives you whatever you want when you ask it, and I’ll ask for a dress and it’ll throw it down to me.”

3. Also: “Why can’t Cinderella just take a taxi to the ball? Or a bus?”

4. When watching a DVD about a mermaid: “I guess mermaids don’t pee or poo, because they don’t have bums, just tails. And that’s a fact. It’s not just an opinion. My teacher told me the difference.”

It’s been fun, Devon.

 

Posted by Beviant at 14:39:31 | Permalink | Comments (2)

Monday, April 7, 2008

The Back Garden: Spring at Last?

 

The Back Garden: Spring At Last?

 

I stand upon the filthy porch

And squint at the unaccustomed sight–

Sunshine coming through unleafed boughs–

As if I’ve emerged from endless night.

 

With ten degrees of Centigrade,

Plus melting snow and warmer sun,

I almost can believe it’s true,

That Springtime has, at last, begun.

 

Now is revealed what winter hid,

The detritus of the season’s blight:

Dead plants of brown, dead grass of grey,

A quite ironic sort of sight.

 

Spilled from a weathered bird feeder

Down to the waiting squirrels below,

A winter’s worth of sunflower seeds

Blackens the piles of melting snow.


Much like Atlantis, rising up

From under the destructive sea,

The patio furniture now appears

With peanut shells as its debris.


Old cat turds dot the dingy snow,

And urine streaks; some pots arise,

Shattered by cold one winter night,

Still caked with soil, to my surprise.


The cats now venture down a walk

Freed from its winter wall of snow;

They can’t believe that spring has come,

And sniff out paths they used to know.

 

I wish for blossoms or for buds

(While, dressed in winter black, I stare)

I wish for robins on the lawn—

But settle for this warming air.

 

There may be blizzards yet to come

Before the blossoms on the trees.

But my request is still the same:

“Could winter now be over, please?”

 

.

 

 

 

 


Posted by Beviant at 15:18:04 | Permalink | Comments (3)

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

Looking for Signs of Spring

March Drive: Looking for Signs of Spring

 

 

A lick of green along the limbs

Of trees beside the road from town

Was all that we were looking for

Instead, the trees stood bare and brown.

 

The stubbled cheeks of nearby hills

Were white with snow: no sign of leaf.

The fields we saw had not been plowed

The pines stood dark with winter grief.

 

The sky was blue, but no birds sang,

On that Spring drive we took that morn,

How hard it was to think: somewhere,

In green fields, lambs were being born.

Posted by Beviant at 17:14:55 | Permalink | Comments (2)

Monday, March 17, 2008

Wiccan Lightbulb Jokes

What do you call 13 witches in a hot tub?
a self-cleaning coven

What is a California Cauldron?
Four Pagans in a Hot tub

Where do witches get their honey?
Blessed Bees!

What’s the difference between a prayer and casting a spell?
Spelling!

The Infamous Pagan Lightbulb Jokes!

How many lesbians does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
> Just one, and it’s NOT FUNNY!!!

How many tree huggers does it take to change a light bulb?
>  One to change the light bulb, one to prepare the environmental impact statement, and the rest to do a self-criticism afterwords…

How many years does it take a feminist to change a lightbulb?
> You can change it whenever you are empowered to do so.

How many Druids does it take to change a lightbulb?
> 501. One to change the bulb and 500 to align the new stone.

How many Druids does it take to change a lightbulb?
> They don’t screw in lightbulbs, they screw in Stone Circles.

How many traditionalists does it take to change a light bulb?
> Candle light was good enough for our ancestors, it’s good enough for us!

How many Brit.Trad WItches does it take to change a light bulb?
> 13. One to change the bulb, and 12 to mourn the passing of the old bulb.

How many Gardnerian witches does it take to change a light bulb?
> (in a low ominous tone) “Why do you want to know…Initiate?”

How many Gardnerian witches does it take to change a light bulb?
> No one knows. It’s a third degree secret.

How many Starhawk witches does it take to change a light bulb?
> (plaintevely) “There are starving villiages in Africa that don’t even HAVE light bulbs…”

How many solitary witches does it take to change a light bulb?
> (if they actually ask ‘how many?’, drum your fingers and stare at them as you wait for them to grasp the obvious)

How many years does it take a Kitchen Witch to change a light bulb?
> Already changed.

How many “School of Wicca” witches does it take to change a light bulb?
> “Just you! That’s right, YOU! And for only $195 we’ll send you our complete “Witches Magic Power of Light Bulb Changing Course” with real knowledge that you can apply this to ANY light bulb ANYwhere! Listen to the testimony of a young couple from Wisconsin who…”


How many Wiccans does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
> Four. One for each direction.

How many Pagans does it take to change a lightbulb?
> Six. One to change it, and five to sit around complaining that lightbulbs never burned out before those damned Christains came along.

How many witches does it take to change a light bulb?
> What do you want it changed into?

How many Aries does it take to change a light bulb?
> Only one, but it takes a hell of a lot of light bulbs.

How many Taurus does it take to change a light bulb?
> What, me move?

How many Geminis does it take to change a light bulb?
> 2

How many Cancers does it take to change a light bulb?
> Only one, but he has to bring his mother.

How many Leos does it take to change a light bulb?
> A dozen. One to change the bulb, and eleven to applaud.

How many Virgos does it take to change a light bulb?
> One to clean out the socket, one to dust the bulb, one to install, and two engineers to check the work.

How many Libras does it take to change a light bulb?
> Libras can’t decide if the bulb needs to be changed.

How many Scorpios does it take to change a light bulb?
> None. They LIKE the dark.

How many Sagittarians does it take to change a light bulb?
> One to install the bulb, and a Virgo to pick up the pieces.

How many Capricorns does it take to change a light bulb?
> The light’s fine as it is.

How many Aquarians does it take to change a light bulb?
> Have you asked the bulb if it WANTS to be changed?

How many Pisceans does it take to change a light bulb?
> What light bulb?

How many astrologers does it take to change a light bulb?
> “Don’t ask me now, Mercury’s retrograde!”

How many New Agers does it take to change a light bulb?
> Five. One to change it and four to share the experience!

How many New-agers does it take to change a light bulb?
> (in a flaky voice) We don’t use light bulbs, we just think happy thoughts at our quartz crystals and they glow.

How many years does it take for a New-ager to change a light bulb?
> Well, it takes many many years, unless you pay $650 US non refundable, Visa or MC accepted. Then you can do it after the weekend intensive training seminar.

How many Boulderites (as in Boulder, CO, mecca of new agers) does it take to change a lightbulb?
> None. They just join self-help groups to learn to live with darkness in their lives.


Posted by Beviant at 21:02:14 | Permalink | Comments (3)










Posted by Beviant at 21:01:56 | Permalink | Comments (2)